I work in fintech sales and business development. I also like finding out whether an idea can be made to work, which is how a question sometimes turns into a tool, a diagram, or this website.
I talk things through, try a version and ask what I’ve missed. AI gives me more room to do that. I don’t necessarily finish sooner; sometimes I just get further into the question.
The useful part is the example, including what still needs work.
01 / A project I built
Flow of Funds
I built a way to describe a payment and explore the steps as a diagram. It gives me something concrete to work through: who is involved, what moves, and what the explanation leaves out.
The check: a convincing diagram still needs to match the payment flow. Drawing a line between two boxes doesn’t establish that money moves that way.
A saved view of the tool. The diagram is a starting point for checking the explanation.
02 / Live, and still being edited
This website
AI helped with the code, image editing and reviews. I supplied the experience and kept correcting the story. The homepage portrait is AI-assisted, and its setting is composed.
One word that matters
I helped grow the client base from one to twelve.
That word keeps my part in the result clear. The same review needs to catch a page that sounds impressive but no longer sounds like me.
The Toronto detail started with the time and directions. When I considered adding weather, I wanted it to do something more useful than display a temperature: help someone visiting decide what to bring.
That became “Come say hello,” with a little advice about layers, a weather-dependent joke and a way to arrange a conversation. The observation source and time are there if you want to check them. If the data is stale, the advice disappears.
It’s a small design decision. Whether visitors find it useful is something I’m still learning.
03 / A small public experiment
A small commerce experiment
The small markers on my watch, shirt, shoes and bike open details and retailer links. I’m exploring what happens between that moment of interest and a real retailer cart.
The check: the right item, available option, current price and an honest handoff to the seller. A clickable marker is only the beginning.
The public version uses retailer links. A separate prototype has reached a retailer checkout in testing; live inventory and agent checkout are still being developed. Purchases finish with the retailer.
So I don’t start from scratch every time
How I keep the context.
I use Basic Memory Cloud for selected background and working preferences. The aim is to keep the useful context current, with the actual work staying in its own files and tools.
01
Context worth keeping
How I write, the work I do, and the purpose of a project. A small set of maintained notes.
Basic Memory Cloud
02
Instructions to reuse
Find the point, keep my voice, challenge the claim. Skills give an assistant a specific job.
Written instructions
03
Where the work stands
The goal, what’s decided, what’s open and the next move. Enough to pick the work up again.
The current project
What that does, and doesn’t, mean
The intention is to reuse the relevant context across tools that can access it. Each connection needs checking. A shared note doesn’t make separate assistants share a conversation, and saved context can still be wrong or out of date.
This page shows the approach and public examples. Private notes, conversations and account configuration stay out of the public material.
A setup that changes as I use it
What I reach for.
Thinking things through
GPT and Claude
My daily drivers, because I’m basic. Useful for another version, another angle, or a question I haven’t asked yet.
Turning an idea into something
Codex, with Hermes in the wider setup
Code, tools and agent workflows. For projects such as Flow of Funds and Polaris, I also use lower-cost APIs where they fit the job.
Getting the thought out
Wispr Flow and saved context
Dictation helps me start. The notes and instructions help an assistant work with the idea, including the corrections.
Trying something new
Midjourney, Jev, GLM and DeepSeek
Things I’ve experimented with alongside my usual tools. Trying something doesn’t automatically make it part of my everyday workflow.
This is a snapshot of my setup, not a ranking or a recommendation to subscribe to everything on the list.
Something you can take away
Try the instructions.
These three are public adaptations of instructions I use. Change them to fit your own work.
Find the throughline
Work out what a wandering conversation is getting at, without treating every idea as a decision.
Where it can go wrong
It can make uncertainty sound settled. Ask for an interpretation you can correct.
These were written for the site and aren’t established parts of my routine: Rehearse a decision and Design a model test. Both can help frame a check; neither substitutes for evidence from actual people or use.